... no offense, always after the title of course!
After then seeing the relationship of respect - disrespect between Jung and Freud, we shall now proceed to analyze in detail the theories of psychologist young!
all started from a dream recounted by Freud to Jung: a room furnished some 'old style wore, steps to a new space below the first, more ancient. This figure was repeated several times, going back more and more time until you reach a cave where you could see the bones. Actual
death wish, as Freud had to say?
I would say no as well as Jung said no (aspè. .. he said yes, but just to make happy ... but then Freud has explained the nature of his own dreams!).
Here, my dear, we introduce the concept of the Collective Unconscious . The always go back in time until, I quote you reaches those with the 'animal soul means that we have within us something that, in key inherited come up to our consciousness, our awareness. Something that is buried, stratified by generations, yet still eager to communicate with our world through images, representations (because he could not do otherwise). This set of primordial images are called archetypes and are the means by which the ' collective unconscious, impersonal and universal in character is to communicate in our personal unconscious, which does nothing but engage (when we are born) with the first.
From this collective unconscious then derive some key images that constitute, by virtue of our experience (which is in addition to some hereditary determination) or our personality traits of it.
I'm thinking for example the definition of shadow, or the hidden part, the negative of ourselves, which we can turn all evil and that, by virtue of this split personality, we tend to regard it as a remnant of our removals . Or
two other important definitions, such as those Anima and Animus . L ' animus present in women, the male is the concession (including biological) in the female personality and the opposite is due to the presence of 'soul the male personality.
summarize what has been said (but of course say more), Jungian psychology finds its purpose in the identification of the self or in bringing about his personality (or consciousness, or Soul, or Self ), or what makes a person real.
Allies for this finding are the symbolic processes that allow through Symbols (and Archetypes) can bring out the confusing picture of the unconscious (collective and personal) a distinction between individuals and shadow. The same personality
is, however, in its being in the world, have to live separated from or relating to the subject with the subject. In these cases we have different character types , who turns towards the object is an extrovert as opposed to those who, turning to the subject, is introverted .
Now, since no person can be only one of these properties, we have to move through gradients of personality, which is a complex scheme by which we recognize some of the dominant characteristics of our personality. To identify them, we need to move around four basic criteria that distinguish us regarding our preparation to the outside (toward the object) or internal (to the subject). These are thoughts, feelings, intuition and sensation. It seems difficult
this scheme? Try to put into practice, despite the obvious limitations of an oversimplification, Jungian theories through these three personality tests: the first is in Italian (the most meager of interest) while the following, in English, are much more comprehensive. I recommend it as a language exercise: Stand with a dictionary nearby and try to answer those questions. If you want, put the score in the comments and feedback obtained (and which test you did).
- In Italian: http://www.altamira.it/html/test_psico/test.asp?cmdG=I
- In English: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
- In English (2): http://similarminds.com/jung.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment